Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30611 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2009 16:21:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2009 16:21:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 11053 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2009 16:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 10974 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2009 16:21:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 10965 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2009 16:21:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:21:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of preethi.cis@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.249] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:21:40 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so91706rvf.24 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:21:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; bh=p6TlPp5CRzi+30R3j7Qofb5phLVNR8v5COgrIyu9nOs=; b=DYs27tI8xMt6isy/+VCQZYsNWIb5EoHZLuO+1p6uf7oNqwc2+e86yPKzXxooDJ1ISK C/olo1teQjISyq4T/Rg8bhB/Rd5Z6iQuHWUdeXNu4WL3QQ9AjOk/Pil7Uz3Zslh/JB5l bIt2Szj+cGnDZvUvJA7y+y9L+o0rI3LkUKvbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to :x-mimeole:thread-index; b=v6E2v4gPM9RCiUMkvez3nB/tMoTe9/KFzjlYx6pKIlQwFoSZmDnf6nMGGwFMdPmAhT Zh0PIxAyH79i4bsSOJ43XUluXNaQEE0eKOM6KO/P1zOF0IJ0bezJ8ZGZyLem3m3+TXy7 9Az//jA5yv5TxmBtB7leHN/G44UCHS2m84leY= Received: by 10.141.4.20 with SMTP id g20mr4094697rvi.173.1238602880071; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prenatarwxp01 (128-107-239-233.cisco.com [128.107.239.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f21sm260751rvb.5.2009.04.01.09.21.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:21:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "Preethi Natarajan" To: "'Paul Querna'" , Cc: , "'Jonathan Leighton'" , "Preethi Natarajan \(prenatar\)" , "'Paul D. Amer'" References: <001701c9b259$4caa6a40$103947ab@cisco.com> <4239a4320903311653t522d4c0ahe0ae8443d9f10d0a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: RE: HTTP over SCTP Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:21:15 -0700 Message-ID: <000601c9b2e5$e3752550$6401a8c0@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4239a4320903311653t522d4c0ahe0ae8443d9f10d0a@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 thread-index: AcmyW/w2Z9hM4CvqSIWhWGKlzAqgZgAh9Vew X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Querna [mailto:paul@querna.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 4:54 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Cc: dev@apr.apache.org; Jonathan Leighton; Preethi Natarajan > (prenatar) > Subject: Re: HTTP over SCTP > > > Please post the patches, preferablly against trunk: > > > Once we see the patches we will be in a much better position > to give feedback, > Paul, Sometime ago, we were directed to do the same. You can find a report (and patch) here -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37202. Breifly, the mods to httpd/APR are: - new Listen directive to include the transport information (I believe this piece created some discussion and we didn't arrive at any conclusion). - changes to configure files to detect sendmsg and recvmsg in the system to send/recv on specific SCTP streams. We would also like to explore the possibility of introducing new send and recv APIs that can have the SCTP stream ID as another argument -- kind of wrappers for sctp_sendmsg and sctp_recvmsg. Thanks, Preethi