Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12183 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2009 05:41:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2009 05:41:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 59414 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2009 05:41:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59363 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2009 05:41:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59354 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2009 05:41:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:41:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.221.21] (HELO mail-qy0-f21.google.com) (209.85.221.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:40:59 +0000 Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so1058432qyk.0 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:40:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.214.115.12 with SMTP id n12mr2083451qac.57.1233898838528; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:40:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9338f5ad0902052139y19d202b3wf513c09c2b0fb36f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9338f5ad0902052121y4ef5487l4ca27d62f3b61a40@mail.gmail.com> <9338f5ad0902052139y19d202b3wf513c09c2b0fb36f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:40:38 -0800 Message-ID: <9338f5ad0902052140h11002501w1f559df3b5b9ae0a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [mod_lua] bytecode caching From: Brian McCallister To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: > I can see how this fits with the spec, but I'd still prefer to find a > different way to pass that information. One way, though I do not like > it much more, is to pass the bytecode in as the filename and look for > lua bytecode's initial bytes: 1b 4c 75 61 51 00 ( Lua > ) -- this is kind of stinky overloading, but not *totally* insane. LuaQ sorry :-)