httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <bri...@skife.org>
Subject Re: [mod_lua] bytecode caching
Date Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:39:14 GMT
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Brian McCallister <brianm@skife.org> wrote:

> It looks like fields were added to apl_vm_spec to allow for bytecode
> caching on the actual spec. I think this is a bad idea. Specs are
> short-lived, typically stack-allocated, structs which exist to group a
> bunch of arguments together.

Ah, I see now why it was done -- to get the inline blocks working. Clever.

I can see how this fits with the spec, but I'd still prefer to find a
different way to pass that information. One way, though I do not like
it much more, is to pass the bytecode in as the filename and look for
lua bytecode's initial bytes: 1b 4c 75 61 51 00 ( <escape> Lua <null>
) -- this is kind of stinky overloading, but not *totally* insane.

Not sure where to lean on this... it is part of the spec, as used --
"here is a script literal" -- looking for thoughts.

-Brian

Mime
View raw message