Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;
  b=WF1TeDz1Zazw5RkCcv5AYuplZyiFpum/iwm7JKG9+atmN4ivzChg1e/byxOB83j7u039rRH29K6Bcpv7/AeNvmjxE8es3u+5FqMb8kCZluSgvUiBq7gcK5UeDV2k8vsLYl+ctWPjy3zxt715oC+EVLrNDq8NXDtHgFhUx7baEhs=;
References: <5c902b9e0812310648i190a2447p74b9eb3bb067b206@mail.gmail.com>
 <495E20CC.1070608@rowe-clan.net> <110771.54407.qm@web54401.mail.yahoo.com>
 <495E26C6.3050300@rowe-clan.net> <898003.47798.qm@web54407.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:57:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <730832.74197.qm@web54401.mail.yahoo.com>


----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:42:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." 
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:37:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> > 
> > Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > 
> > >> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." 
> > >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:12:28 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> > >>
> > >> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > >>> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> > >>>
> > >>> to headeradd for cvs@httpd, overriding the normal To:
> > >>> cvs@httpd.apache.org.  That should prevent Reply-All from picking up
> > >>> the commit list, since there won't be anything in the To: or CC:
> > >>> fields for it to use.
> > >> Last I checked, thunderbird reply-all does cc undisclosed-recipients.
> > >> Very irritating given how we configured the apmail reply-to-all's.
> > > 
> > > Are you sure?  AIUI the list is now configured to behave in the
> > > same way that ezmlm deals with moderation requests.
> > 
> > Correction, the exact header used for the apr moderation queue is;
> > 
> >   To: Recipient list not shown: ;
> > 
> > so not the same thing as "undisclosed-recipients:"
> 
> 
> Updated.

FWIW, RFC-2822 says the text shouldn't matter, as both headers constitute
empty groups (albeit with different names).