Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35096 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2009 15:13:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2009 15:13:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 14608 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2009 15:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14542 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2009 15:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14532 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2009 15:13:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:13:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO opensolaris.local) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:13:31 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (opensolaris [127.0.0.1]) by opensolaris.local (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n05FDuME000996 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:13:57 GMT Message-ID: <496223B4.3060508@webthing.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:13:56 +0000 From: Nick Kew User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081023) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r731358 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_ext_filter.xml modules/filters/mod_ext_filter.c References: <20090104205242.471C5238899E@eris.apache.org> <4961E048.1050800@apache.org> <4962081B.6070502@webthing.com> <49621F74.6020405@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <49621F74.6020405@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 01/05/2009 02:16 PM, Nick Kew wrote: >> Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >>> Hm. I am slightly confused here. The documentation states that "abort" >>> should be >>> the default behaviour (that is the else branch), but if nothing is set >>> in the config >>> onfail defaults to -1 which would cause to get us here (the remove case). >>> So either the documentation or the code is wrong. >> Fixed in r731388, which is included in the backport proposal. >> Thanks for reviewing. > > IMHO r731388 does not fix my concern. The concern I have is that documentation > and code are contrary on what is the default behaviour if nothing is set. Aaargh! OK, my local copy is changed to testing (ctx->dc->onfail == 1). It seems that got omitted from my commit, so you're right. Fixing it now! (the difference arose because the local copy has an experimental variant in with #ifdef, and I couldn't be arsed to tidy all that up). -- Nick Kew