----- Original Message ---- > From: Jim Jagielski > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 1:47:57 PM > Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd? > > > On Jan 2, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > >> From: Justin Erenkrantz > >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org > >> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 12:45:39 PM > >> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd? > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >>> Nice. How do people actually handle moderation at the ASF then? > >>> You're *supposed* to be using Reply-All when you want to accept > >>> a post. Are none of these clients out there ezmlm-compatible? > >> > >> Gmail does the same thing in my last set of moderation emails (the > >> last list I moderated got deleted last month). Reply-all yields > >> -accept, not found, -allow. > >> > >> I don't *recall* that being the behavior before with Gmail, but it > >> seems that's what it does now... -- justin > > > > > > Shrug, I can try completely removing the To: header, but I'm fairly > > certain that some MTA's will add one back (and a missing To: header > > will trigger anti-spam). Other than that, it's pick your poison > > time, since no universal solution seems at hand. > > Make the To: line the bit-bucket? Like no-reply@ nobody@apache.org routes to the bit-bucket, so that would work for the To: header. That's what I would recommend doing at this point, although I've just implemented Justin's recommended config and will stop there until the list comes to a decision.