httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
Date Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:57:44 GMT




----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:42:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." 
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:37:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> > 
> > Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > 
> > >> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." 
> > >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:12:28 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> > >>
> > >> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > >>> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> > >>>
> > >>> to headeradd for cvs@httpd, overriding the normal To:
> > >>> cvs@httpd.apache.org.  That should prevent Reply-All from picking up
> > >>> the commit list, since there won't be anything in the To: or CC:
> > >>> fields for it to use.
> > >> Last I checked, thunderbird reply-all does cc undisclosed-recipients.
> > >> Very irritating given how we configured the apmail reply-to-all's.
> > > 
> > > Are you sure?  AIUI the list is now configured to behave in the
> > > same way that ezmlm deals with moderation requests.
> > 
> > Correction, the exact header used for the apr moderation queue is;
> > 
> >   To: Recipient list not shown: ;
> > 
> > so not the same thing as "undisclosed-recipients:"
> 
> 
> Updated.

FWIW, RFC-2822 says the text shouldn't matter, as both headers constitute
empty groups (albeit with different names).


      

Mime
View raw message