httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
Date Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:37:24 GMT
----- Original Message ----

> From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 8:08:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> 
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> From: Justin Erenkrantz 
> >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> >> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 1:28:27 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>> Shrug, I can try completely removing the To: header, but I'm fairly
> >>> certain that some MTA's will add one back (and a missing To: header
> >>> will trigger anti-spam).  Other than that, it's pick your poison
> >>> time, since no universal solution seems at hand.
> >> 
> >> To: dev@httpd would likely be mis-leading...how about re-enabling
> >> -allow/-subscribe lists so that folks who are subscribed don't get the
> >> bounce?  Or?  -- justin
> > 
> > Andre and Roy are the only ones signed up for moderation of cvs@httpd.
> > I think the people who want it to go back to being a moderated list
> > should first step up and offer to moderate it before we revert the
> > config.
> 
> I am completely uninterested in "fixing" the config just because some
> person reflexively does a reply-all and then doesn't edit their own
> destination addresses.  There is nothing to fix here.  A bounce is what
> they are supposed to receive to keep the discussion on dev.
> 

As I mentioned on infra@ the editor config for cvs@httpd is currently a hack.
Shall I restore it to the original, supported config?


      

Mime
View raw message