httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
Subject Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
Date Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:15:43 GMT
On 02.01.2009 17:58, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>> From: Rainer Jung<rainer.jung@kippdata.de>
>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 11:43:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
>>
>> On 02.01.2009 15:57, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
>>>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:42:20 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
>>>>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:37:58 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
>>>>>>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:12:28 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>>>>>>> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to headeradd for cvs@httpd, overriding the normal To:
>>>>>>>> cvs@httpd.apache.org.  That should prevent Reply-All from
picking up
>>>>>>>> the commit list, since there won't be anything in the To:
or CC:
>>>>>>>> fields for it to use.
>>>>>>> Last I checked, thunderbird reply-all does cc undisclosed-recipients.
>>>>>>> Very irritating given how we configured the apmail reply-to-all's.
>>>>>> Are you sure?  AIUI the list is now configured to behave in the
>>>>>> same way that ezmlm deals with moderation requests.
>>>>> Correction, the exact header used for the apr moderation queue is;
>>>>>
>>>>>     To: Recipient list not shown: ;
>>>>>
>>>>> so not the same thing as "undisclosed-recipients:"
>>>> Updated.
>>> FWIW, RFC-2822 says the text shouldn't matter, as both headers constitute
>>> empty groups (albeit with different names).
>> I tried with Thunderbird 3.0b1. It copies
>>
>> Recipient list not shown: ;
>>
>> as well as
>>
>> undisclosed-recipients:;
>>
>> to CC when replying to all. When actually sending the message a popup
>> occurs, that informs the user, that the address needs to be corrected
>> because it is invalid. You can't send before changing or removing the
>> address.
>
> So, is that better or worse than getting a bounce message?

I would say it's better, because you are aware of the problem before 
sending. But that's probably very subjective.

The problem with Thunderbird is known:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450497
and maybe
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83521

but not yet fixed.

Regards,

Rainer

Mime
View raw message