httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
Date Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:58:38 GMT
----- Original Message ----

> From: Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de>
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 11:43:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> 
> On 02.01.2009 15:57, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Joe Schaefer
> >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> >> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:42:20 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> >>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> >>> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:37:58 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> >>>
> >>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> >>>>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:12:28 AM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Configuration change for cvs@httpd?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >>>>>> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> to headeradd for cvs@httpd, overriding the normal To:
> >>>>>> cvs@httpd.apache.org.  That should prevent Reply-All from picking
up
> >>>>>> the commit list, since there won't be anything in the To: or
CC:
> >>>>>> fields for it to use.
> >>>>> Last I checked, thunderbird reply-all does cc undisclosed-recipients.
> >>>>> Very irritating given how we configured the apmail reply-to-all's.
> >>>> Are you sure?  AIUI the list is now configured to behave in the
> >>>> same way that ezmlm deals with moderation requests.
> >>> Correction, the exact header used for the apr moderation queue is;
> >>>
> >>>    To: Recipient list not shown: ;
> >>>
> >>> so not the same thing as "undisclosed-recipients:"
> >>
> >> Updated.
> >
> > FWIW, RFC-2822 says the text shouldn't matter, as both headers constitute
> > empty groups (albeit with different names).
> 
> I tried with Thunderbird 3.0b1. It copies
> 
> Recipient list not shown: ;
> 
> as well as
> 
> undisclosed-recipients:;
> 
> to CC when replying to all. When actually sending the message a popup 
> occurs, that informs the user, that the address needs to be corrected 
> because it is invalid. You can't send before changing or removing the 
> address.

So, is that better or worse than getting a bounce message?  I'll point out
that Yahoo! used to have a similar problem, but have since resolved it.  I
wonder what gmail does now?


      

Mime
View raw message