Hi, guys
Good news is I track down another author now. We are talking about the
license questions now, so far so good :)
Thanks
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Chris Darroch" <chrisd@pearsoncmg.com>
> 发送时间: 2009年1月1日 星期四
> 收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: mod_fcgid license questions
>
> Hi --
>
> > On 31 Dec 2008, at 05:48, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >
> >>> Foes anyone have a sense of whether these would indeed require
> >>> a CLA and SGA?
> >>
> >> They look like simple repairs to me. More importantly, if he thinks
> >> they are simple repairs and he is happy to see them Apache Licensed,
> >> then there is no need for a CLA or software grant.
> >
> > +1. This is in the same ballpark as third-party patches we routinely
> > accept, e.g. from reports in bugzilla.
>
> OK, that sounds reasonable. I think we're just waiting to hear
> from one other person, then.
>
> Chris.
>
> --
> GPG Key ID: 366A375B
> GPG Key Fingerprint: 485E 5041 17E1 E2BB C263 E4DE C8E3 FA36 366A 375B
>
|