Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41515 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2008 01:24:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2008 01:24:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 59947 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2008 01:24:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59874 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2008 01:24:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 59865 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2008 01:24:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:24:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [24.71.223.10] (HELO idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca) (24.71.223.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:23:57 +0000 Received: from pd4ml2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.136]) by pd4mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 11 Dec 2008 18:23:34 -0700 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=DVHFzijvnmK8COlcHt0A:9 a=_2Nw9aDFwaaCD-n1pZVvmq44TBoA:4 Received: from s010600119555dbca.gv.shawcable.net (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.69.70.142]) by pd4ml2so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 11 Dec 2008 18:23:34 -0700 Message-ID: <4941BD5E.8080301@pearsoncmg.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:24:46 -0800 From: Chris Darroch Organization: Pearson CMG/CTG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081114 SeaMonkey/1.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Authz directives References: <48D7D3F7.1080804@pobox.com> <48D92FF9.2040104@pearsoncmg.com> <1223300090.5134.1277741805@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4908E115.8030508@pearsoncmg.com> <49347037.50406@pearsoncmg.com> <0501DC2B-32EA-4056-951E-5D3431691BD1@gbiv.com> <493EB957.6050509@pearsoncmg.com> <493EBCCA.3010101@pearsoncmg.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I don't see a problem with RequireNone inverting the logic, and > I think it would actually be useful for blocking a set of bad > clients. Is it difficult to include that without MatchNotAny? Not at all difficult; trivial, in fact. The only reason I took it out as well was the name "inversion" issue. I'll put it back in and commit tomorrow. Might take a few days to deal with the doc adjustments, but otherwise a simple job. Thanks for the comments! Chris. -- GPG Key ID: 366A375B GPG Key Fingerprint: 485E 5041 17E1 E2BB C263 E4DE C8E3 FA36 366A 375B