Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jim@jagunet.com designates
 209.133.199.10 as permitted sender)
Message-Id: <21C93DD1-A452-4C12-9C91-51086B89E79F@jaguNET.com>
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <0359AF4D-B9D6-4221-9BFE-D0F7FFC03512@gbiv.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: Re: changing mod_wombat's name
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:19:01 -0500
References: <9338f5ad0812071229h33acac1bm6b8559ece25f4185@mail.gmail.com>
 <493C3AF4.3050106@force-elite.com>
 <0359AF4D-B9D6-4221-9BFE-D0F7FFC03512@gbiv.com>


On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:04 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>
>> Brian McCallister wrote:
>>> I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name  
>>> is
>>> likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk.
>>>
>>> The obvious name, mod_lua, is a bit tricky as there are about half a
>>> dozen projects named "mod_lua" -- most of which are dead.
>>>
>>> I don't have a really good alternative, which is why the working  
>>> name
>>> mod_wombat came into being, but I think leaving that name will cause
>>> user confusion.
>>
>> +1 to renaming, but I'm not sure we can or should call it "mod_lua".
>>
>> Any other ideas?
>
> mod_luau      <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luau>
>

*grin*

+1