Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46125 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2008 15:40:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2008 15:40:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 71981 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2008 15:40:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 71928 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2008 15:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 71919 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2008 15:40:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 07:40:44 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jim@jagunet.com designates 209.133.199.10 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:39:17 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jaguNET.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AA649895E2 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:39:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: From: Jim Jagielski To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49302488.5000002@force-elite.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:39:34 -0500 References: <49302488.5000002@force-elite.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 28, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Hi dev@, > > FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in > about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. > > As in the previous 2.${odd} release cycles, this is not a stable > release, do not guarantee a stable ABI, and would not be recommended > for production usage: > > > I think we need to start stabilizing trunk, and getting on the path > of doing 2.4.x 'soon'. > > In other words, if you wanted some big ass feature in 2.4, start > coding now, your time is short :D > I will be adding at least 2 new hooks to mod_proxy... Plus, I'd like for the monitor hook to take some useful arguments rather than just a pool :) :)