Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12097 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2008 16:56:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2008 16:56:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 36374 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2008 16:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36297 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2008 16:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36288 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2008 16:56:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:56:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chip@force-elite.com designates 72.232.80.58 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.232.80.58] (HELO constant.northnitch.com) (72.232.80.58) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:55:01 +0000 Received: from dhcp-114.in.force-elite.com (force-elite.com [66.225.25.189]) by constant.northnitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1671572D1 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:55:14 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <49302261.6020801@force-elite.com> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:54:57 -0800 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R References: <99EA83DCDE961346AFA9B5EC33FEC08B0176A71E@VF-MBX11.internal.vodafone.com> In-Reply-To: <99EA83DCDE961346AFA9B5EC33FEC08B0176A71E@VF-MBX11.internal.vodafone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Pl�m, R�diger, VF-Group wrote: > What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for T&R on the weekend? > As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems. I'm not actually sure now days what specific version should be used, I haven't done RM in a while :-/ Just make sure you use a local copy, hand compiled version, not something an operating packaging system installs, and possibly patches to their liking. -Paul