Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <49207CC8.4010401@kippdata.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:04:24 +0100
From: Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 2.2.11?
References: <491F3613.3000509@apache.org> <49201709.6080805@apache.org>
 <492077B0.8030902@ptc.com>
In-Reply-To: <492077B0.8030902@ptc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

ess Holle schrieb:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> Given the positive feedback: Please vote now on the backports :-).
>>   
> I /really/ want to see a sub-second proxy connection timeout as this is
> needed due to Windows' inappropriate RFC interpretation.  This would be
> r705005 produced by Ruediger, I believe.
> 
> If this is not part of 2.2.11 (I'm pretty sure it did not go into
> 2.2.10) then I'm going to have to backport this myself into our binaries
> for real soon here and keep doing so with each new 2.2.x.  It would be
> /much/ better to just have this in 2.2.x.

This has already been backported to 2.2.x on November 11th:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=713145

and

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-cvs/200811.mbox/%3C20081111200203.96CE6238889D@eris.apache.org%3E

Regards,

Rainer