Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb:
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Paul Querna
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R
>>
>> Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
>>> What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for
>> T&R on the weekend?
>>> As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems.
>> I'm not actually sure now days what specific version should
>> be used, I
>> haven't done RM in a while :-/
>>
>> Just make sure you use a local copy, hand compiled version, not
>
> That was my plan. Jim what versions did you use last time?
The generated files in the httpd distribution and also in the bundled
apr/apr-util tell us it was autoconf 2.61 and libtool 1.5.26.
There was a short discussion about autoconf versions and apr and httpd
releasing before 2.2.10:
http://marc.info/?t=122168206000001&r=1&w=2
The technical reasons for nit chosing 2.62 are contained in the
discussion starting with your mail
http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=121814441110258&w=2
Regards,
Rainer
|