httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R
Date Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:17:23 GMT
2008-11-29 15:49:36 Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group napisał(a):
> 
> > -----Ursprngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: "Plm, Rdiger, VF-Group" ] 
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 2008 15:19
> > An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Ursprngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.  
> > > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 2008 04:06
> > > An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R
> > > 
> > > Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > > > Any objections going with autoconf 2.63 and libtool 1.5.26?
> > > > 
> > > > If autoconf 2.63 is seen as too risky I would go back to 
> > > autoconf 2.61.
> > > 
> > > I see no remaining issues for 2.63... solid choice.  The endianess
> > > issues of 2.62 should all be addressed.
> > > 
> > 
> > autoconf 2.63 still emits the warnings for APR / APR-UTIL configure
> > options passed to it. The following patch should fix this:
> > 
> > Index: configure.in
> > ===================================================================
> > --- configure.in        (revision 721659)
> > +++ configure.in        (working copy)
> > @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
> >  sinclude(build/find_apu.m4)
> >  sinclude(acinclude.m4)
> > 
> > +dnl We don't want our confingure to emit any warnings for any
> > +dnl APR / APR-UTIL configure options

Why do you want to pass invalid options to configure?
(Also: s/confingure/configure/)

> > +AC_DISABLE_OPTION_CHECKING
> > +
> >  dnl XXX we can't just use AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT because that 
> > isn't subbed in
> >  dnl by configure until it is too late.  Is that how it 
> > should be or not?
> >  dnl Something seems broken here.
> > 
> > Any objections?
> > 
> > Otherwise I would commit to trunk and propose it for backport.
> 
> This does not work with older autoconf versions :-(.
> 
> Anyone an idea for a code that only calls
> 
> AC_DISABLE_OPTION_CHECKING
> 
> if it is defined?

ifdef([AC_DISABLE_OPTION_CHECKING], [AC_DISABLE_OPTION_CHECKING])

http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/manual/html_node/Ifdef.html

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Mime
View raw message