Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15785 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2008 07:53:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2008 07:53:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 28908 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2008 07:53:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28810 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2008 07:53:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28792 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2008 07:53:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:53:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.232.80.58] (HELO constant.northnitch.com) (72.232.80.58) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:52:28 +0000 Received: from BlueWater.local (c-67-164-104-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.164.104.143]) by constant.northnitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B90B8B9D; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:52:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <48F05B34.9060306@apache.org> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:52:20 -0700 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org CC: Apache Infrastructure Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10 References: <48F04030.6090406@force-elite.com> In-Reply-To: <48F04030.6090406@force-elite.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=42721F00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Paul Querna wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Based on the positive feedback on the test tarballs, I'd >> like to start a vote on releasing 2.2.10. I'm looking to >> release on Tuesday, since I'll be traveling Monday, so I'll >> close the vote on Tues AM. > > I've upgraded eos.apache.org and aurora.apache.org to 2.2.10, which are > both solaris 10 on sparc, aka the servers hosting www.apache.org and > most TLP sites. > > Seems good so far. > > Lemme know if anyone sees anything odd. Well, I forgot to mention, I *thought* I installed the Worker MPM. But due to me failing at editing config.nice, I actually built the Event MPM. Which promptly stopped responding to requests on aurora.apache.org within a two hours. I've since fixed the build and switched to the worker mpm on both aurora and eos. (and if anyone could figure out the event mpm problem on solaris, that'd be sweet, but its not a regression afaik).