Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47576 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2008 02:50:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2008 02:50:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 97460 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2008 02:50:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97408 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2008 02:50:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97399 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2008 02:50:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:50:20 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.33] (HELO smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.33) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:49:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 22885 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2008 02:49:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.33) with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2008 02:49:49 -0000 Message-ID: <48EEC2CD.8000000@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:49:49 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache httpd 2.2.10 test tarballs available... References: <48ECF2CE.30305@rowe-clan.net> <200810082015.29135.oeriksson@mandriva.com> <48ED194D.4080107@rowe-clan.net> <48ED1BA8.1020102@force-elite.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> So.... Can we ask the mod_fcgid project if we could import it? > > If they are willing to change the license :) You totally miss the point. We aren't entirely clear if this author even has the IP they claim to have (talk about IP import processes). He claims GPL. He adds no restrictions, and; 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to this License. however, if the work was at all based on the code authored by the crew for mod_fastcgi, as opposed to the coding logic of mod_fastcgi, we have; -------------------- This FastCGI application library source and object code (the "Software") and its documentation (the "Documentation") are copyrighted by Open Market, Inc ("Open Market"). The following terms apply to all files associated with the Software and Documentation unless explicitly disclaimed in individual files. Open Market permits you to use, copy, modify, distribute, and license this Software and the Documentation solely for the purpose of implementing the FastCGI specification defined by Open Market or derivative specifications publicly endorsed by Open Market and promulgated by an open standards organization and for no other purpose, provided that existing copyright notices are retained in all copies and that this notice is included verbatim in any distributions. No written agreement, license, or royalty fee is required for any of the authorized uses. Modifications to this Software and Documentation may be copyrighted by their authors and need not follow the licensing terms described here, but the modified Software and Documentation must be used for the sole purpose of implementing the FastCGI specification defined by Open Market or derivative specifications publicly endorsed by Open Market and promulgated by an open standards organization and for no other purpose. If modifications to this Software and Documentation have new licensing terms, the new terms must protect Open Market's proprietary rights in the Software and Documentation to the same extent as these licensing terms and must be clearly indicated on the first page of each file where they apply. Open Market shall retain all right, title and interest in and to the Software and Documentation, including without limitation all patent, copyright, trade secret and other proprietary rights. OPEN MARKET MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO THE SOFTWARE OR THE DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL OPEN MARKET BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING FROM OR RELATING TO THIS SOFTWARE OR THE DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR SIMILAR DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOST PROFITS OR LOST DATA, EVEN IF OPEN MARKET HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. THE SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION ARE PROVIDED "AS IS". OPEN MARKET HAS NO LIABILITY IN CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF THIS SOFTWARE OR THE DOCUMENTATION. ---------------------- which is altogether out of sorts with either the GPL or the AL. So before we ask the authors if they would relicense, we first need to ask them if they've offered a legitimate license in the first place.