Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jorge.schrauwen@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.238 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=kOwf3S2+NLtmkBIEjXlqkEuNLMM6IbmlRw1/M2lY66qWjo/ea1YR5QVz1Z3z34OdUD
         DOKUA5u2NMhIXsruPpSDhlwDbyDa23MRSheIRuwZse/YaBU22GNwDg//XI6VcXXndxgd
         S6/t8/0ltH+/NBJwbVNvlBP64/BbXmq6wY7ss=
Message-ID: <43e40e000809140447p431f3763q54ead47621979d3d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 13:47:35 +0200
From: "Jorge Schrauwen" <jorge.schrauwen@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [community] 2.3.0 alpha on October 1?
In-Reply-To: <768571A4AC24444BA80DD0FF6DDDA316@bspc0>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_5676_8352517.1221392855639"
References: <768571A4AC24444BA80DD0FF6DDDA316@bspc0>

------=_Part_5676_8352517.1221392855639
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bing Swen <bswen@pku.edu.cn> wrote:

> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote on 2008年8月22日 9:03:
>
>> Which brings me to the other half of [community], I'm proposing we hold
>> an Apache httpd {next} barcamp session for the community who are at
>> ApacheCon BarCamp on Tuesday to learn about what has changed, what might
>> change, and perhaps if we get enough folks to express interest ... about
>> what they want to change.
>>
>
> Another related question: We haven't been able to build httpd on 64-bit
> Windows for about two and half years, since the April 2006 release of
> httpd-2.2.2 (But x64 build is crucial for our application, and that's why we
> are still using that "aged version"). Shall we have 64-bit Windows release
> in the near future, say 2.2.10? (btw, we are really delighted to see that
> now APR has a *clean* compile on x64 Windows.)
>
> Bing
> ----


This is no true. The latest version I've been able to compile was 2.2.9
http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries

You are however correct that it's getting more cumbersome! Vista + VS
2005/2008 is a no go. I'm using a XP x64 with VS 2005 in vmware to build it
now. Also command line building is busted Using the IDE it's still possible.

Jorge


>
> School of EE & CS,
> Peking University,
> Beijing 100871
>
>

------=_Part_5676_8352517.1221392855639
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bing Swen <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bswen@pku.edu.cn">bswen@pku.edu.cn</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote on 2008年8月22日 9:03:<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Which brings me to the other half of [community], I&#39;m proposing we hold<br>
an Apache httpd {next} barcamp session for the community who are at<br>
ApacheCon BarCamp on Tuesday to learn about what has changed, what might<br>
change, and perhaps if we get enough folks to express interest ... about<br>
what they want to change.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Another related question: We haven&#39;t been able to build httpd on 64-bit Windows for about two and half years, since the April 2006 release of httpd-2.2.2 (But x64 build is crucial for our application, and that&#39;s why we are still using that &quot;aged version&quot;). Shall we have 64-bit Windows release in the near future, say 2.2.10? (btw, we are really delighted to see that now APR has a *clean* compile on x64 Windows.)<br>

<br>
Bing<br>
----</blockquote><div><br>This is no true. The latest version I&#39;ve been able to compile was 2.2.9<br><a href="http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries">http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries</a><br><br>You are however correct that it&#39;s getting more cumbersome! Vista + VS 2005/2008 is a no go. I&#39;m using a XP x64 with VS 2005 in vmware to build it now. Also command line building is busted Using the IDE it&#39;s still possible.<br>
<br>Jorge<br>&nbsp;</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
School of EE &amp; CS,<br>
Peking University,<br>
Beijing 100871 <br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

------=_Part_5676_8352517.1221392855639--