Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24558 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2008 12:31:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2008 12:31:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 13506 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2008 12:30:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13448 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2008 12:30:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13436 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2008 12:30:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:30:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:30:00 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jaguNET.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68742D8D469 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:29:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: From: Jim Jagielski To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <489619FA.7030600@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: worker MPM on trunk does not shut down cleanly Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:29:56 -0400 References: <488F846F.1050207@apache.org> <488F8539.1020608@apache.org> <48922481.1010304@apache.org> <4892CCE2.1040509@apache.org> <36E5419C-2687-4447-9E89-76FD0371B906@jaguNET.com> <489619FA.7030600@rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 3, 2008, at 4:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> So does this mean that trunk is now based on a "broken" or >> incompatible version of apr? Do we need to now break off >> trunk to 2.4 and baseline APR 1.3 to allow trunk to now work >> with an incompatible APR rev? > > There's no such thing as an incompatible APR revision. There *shouldn't* be. There is. That's the problem :)