httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oden Eriksson <oeriks...@mandriva.com>
Subject Re: SNI in 2.2.x (Re: Time for 2.2.10?)
Date Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:06:33 GMT
Den Tuesday 19 August 2008 08:16:08 skrev Kaspar Brand:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > At the moment we have 9 entries in the CHANGES file for 2.2.10 and
> > there are 5 more proposals in the STATUS file that are missing only
> > one vote. I think if get these done we also have enough stuff from
> > pure httpd point of view that warrants a release. WDYT?
>
> May I use this occasion to ask if there's still a chance of getting a
> backport of SNI accepted for 2.2.x? Following suggestions from Joe, I
> went through all relevant SSL* config directives and posted my findings
> in two parts on 9th/18th June:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200806.mbox/%3c484CBAA6.
>7050702@velox.ch%3e
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200806.mbox/%3c48592955.
>2090303@velox.ch%3e
>
> The patch I posted on 18 June introduced a regression, however, so I
> posted an updated version on 26th June:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200806.mbox/%3c4863C04C.
>2010502@velox.ch%3e
>
> That's the version I still consider suitable for check-in to trunk
> (attached again for convenience). A backport to 2.2.x is available at
>
> http://sni.velox.ch/httpd-2.2.x-sni.diff
>
> If, on the other hand, people think that SNI isn't important enough for
> 2.2.x, then I'd be glad to hear that as well (it doesn't make sense to
> repeatedly nag the list about that topic, I think).
>
> Thanks,
> Kaspar

FYI: This patch is applied in Mandriva Linux.



Mime
View raw message