httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <n...@webthing.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r683465 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:18:23 GMT
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:09:56 -0400
Tom Donovan <donovant@bellatlantic.net> wrote:

> Nick Kew wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:30:49 -0000
> > tdonovan@apache.org wrote:
> > 
> >> remove proposal accidentally added twice
> > 
> > I was about to ask whether you planned to vote on the other
> > instance of it, when I saw:
> 
> Looking at the "backport to 2.2" votes in STATUS, they all seem to be
> from experienced httpd maintainers; so I was unsure if I should vote
> myself or wait for three +1's from others before proceeding.

Your +1 in STATUS is worth the same as anyone else's.  That's a
threshold you passed when you became a committer.  Another thing
you can do now when you have time for it is to review proposals
in STATUS and vote and/or comment on them.

> > That's actually different: only the first patch was already
> > proposed. Maybe you'd like to clarify?
> 
> r670061 was my first attempt to fix it.
> 
> Ruediger pointed out that this change could break forward proxies in
>    http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.devel/34670
> so I corrected the fix in r670198.

Then it would be a good idea to include that in the backport proposal,
typically by amending the existing one (add a note something like
"please add r670198").

-- 
Nick Kew

Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/

Mime
View raw message