httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Consider breaking out ldap library dependencies?
Date Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:11:07 GMT

On Jun 5, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:

>
>
> On 06/05/2008 06:00 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> apr-util-1.3 lets us link httpd (and support/) in such a way as to  
>> avoid
>> all ldap entanglements.
>> Any thoughts on adopting
>> http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ldap/httpd-2.2-ldap.patch
>> for the coming release?  If built static, do we already merge up  
>> all those
>> LDADD flags, or is there some magic we need to add to accomplish  
>> that?
>
> As I would not like to see 2.2.9 already *dependent* on apr / apr- 
> util 1.3.x
> (only shipped with apr / apr-util 1.3.x) I propose to do this only  
> on trunk
> and postpone backporting to the point of time where we make 2.2.x  
> dependent
> on 1.3.x which IMHO depends on the real live quality of 1.3.x. So if  
> it is
> good, it may be 2.2.10 which becomes dependent on 1.3.x.
>

Hmmm... I don't see the patch as requiring 1.3.x...

What am I missing?


Mime
View raw message