Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9197 invoked from network); 20 May 2008 14:41:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2008 14:41:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 97639 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2008 14:41:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97584 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2008 14:41:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97573 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2008 14:41:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 07:41:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.158] (HELO yw-out-1718.google.com) (74.125.46.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 14:40:20 +0000 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so1286001ywa.84 for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 07:40:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4lJcjgUZlo042HQaR9nNnO6ZjSeXL67WJmTUv92GzYk=; b=rfsDBDCp+sKvGCvbYydoI4n+m4X1eKMgQ53bapGeLgK4fI8BAHPJ1r44r36D4/Cc3zToye8VVgFh2f7WNTP9dGtqPICkSJHzt9EucFzLC6booHaLRza/j0xF9m9jvT4YkTB2hkivMaB1W9vN8oDd1zSiqd0tnM3I7w2EH44/0f0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lHuogOmKqbeehwFwrcd7xhIFJHdfg8gmE2Sjxy3XnWbLGuRNKBldodKSHns1MMYFxWpezBRKw27dtHVCgE9u+nK9I4yVw+K//RUBC5LFpJRG3Cc/5L/E0FJJAY7XrZbUGVwHHcFyZ5m3OMs1A7jaQRx9bXazc8fHzDZ8+Y8Ifg0= Received: by 10.150.144.9 with SMTP id r9mr7535990ybd.242.1211294425227; Tue, 20 May 2008 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.216.11 with HTTP; Tue, 20 May 2008 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:40:25 -0400 From: "Jeff Trawick" To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Empty Reason Phrase (BZ 44995/45092) In-Reply-To: <4832CA69.2010204@kippdata.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4832CA69.2010204@kippdata.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi, > > I did some research on BZ 44995 and BZ 45092 and stumbled into the following > observation: > > It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the > status line. RFC 2616 allows an empty reason phrase: just a little background for the time being, not intended to address the points you raise http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=114012084824065&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=114019226127669&w=2