Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7977 invoked from network); 23 May 2008 00:35:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2008 00:35:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 28072 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2008 00:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 27989 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2008 00:35:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 27978 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2008 00:35:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 17:35:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.35] (HELO smtpauth12.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 May 2008 00:34:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 3488 invoked from network); 23 May 2008 00:34:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (71.239.140.137) by smtpauth12.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.35) with ESMTP; 23 May 2008 00:34:57 -0000 Message-ID: <48361130.20400@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 19:34:56 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.2.9 status References: <019E26AF-FE2A-4B14-B058-FCE1E7FACD4A@jaguNET.com> <4835C078.60009@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Go ahead and migrate them. Happy to. > I looked at the patch last week and found > no clue as to how to evaluate it without a working win32 install. Understandable. I thought for a while about going the utf-8 route, but since this code would never, never be applicable anywhere else, I just gave up on the thought. > You are the only windows developer on trunk, so let's just treat > anything specific to win32 as auto-backport until the folks who only > test releases start complaining. Same goes for BeOS, if anyone cares. Was ... welcome Tom :-) Makes sense, although I had tossed up to http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ in hopes that one of the many users might test the new ApacheMonitor (message id <481B3CEB.4030004@rowe-clan.net>). A shame that didn't happen but agreed, no reason to let this block a release. Bill