httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
Subject Re: 2.2.9
Date Wed, 07 May 2008 12:47:20 GMT
 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jim Jagielski 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2008 14:26
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: 2.2.9
> 
> 
> On May 7, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Nick Kew wrote:
> >
> >>>    2. Consensus on whether we ship with APR 1.2.x or 1.3.x...
> >>>       My pref would be 1.3.
> >>
> >> -1.
> >
> > I tend to agree with NOT shipping 1.3.
> >
> 
> This goes w/o saying, but I'll do so anyway.
> 
> If 1.3.0 is not ready for prime time, then (1) we assume that
> APR will not tag and release it and (2) we do not bundle httpd 2.2.9
> with it. This does not mean that later versions of 2.2.x won't
> ship with it.
> 
> With our httpd hat on, we do what's best for httpd, even if that
> means we don't "push" APR ;)

Keep in mind that if we do not bundle 1.3 we need to do a new release
of 1.2.x as it contains a regression.

Regards

Rüdiger


Mime
View raw message