httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: 2.2.9
Date Wed, 07 May 2008 12:26:24 GMT

On May 7, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:

> On Tue, 6 May 2008, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>>>    2. Consensus on whether we ship with APR 1.2.x or 1.3.x...
>>>       My pref would be 1.3.
>>
>> -1.
>
> I tend to agree with NOT shipping 1.3.
>

This goes w/o saying, but I'll do so anyway.

If 1.3.0 is not ready for prime time, then (1) we assume that
APR will not tag and release it and (2) we do not bundle httpd 2.2.9
with it. This does not mean that later versions of 2.2.x won't
ship with it.

With our httpd hat on, we do what's best for httpd, even if that
means we don't "push" APR ;)


Mime
View raw message