httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: low hanging fruit in proxy_balancer
Date Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:05:23 GMT

On Apr 17, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. April 2008 14:49
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: low hanging fruit in proxy_balancer
>>
>> One of our class attendees this week had an interesting suggesting  
>> for
>> a balancer-manager feature.  Right now each member is a
>> 2-state, either
>> enabled or disabled.
>>
>> For session stickiness, he suggested a tristate third option to bleed
>> out the remaining sessions, dispatching no /new/ sessions into the
>> particular member.  This would let the existing sessions drain and
>> complete, in order to take down a member without disrupting
>> any logins.
>
> In principle we already have this, but we do not make any difference  
> between
> PROXY_WORKER_DISABLED and PROXY_WORKER_STOPPED and of course we are  
> are missing
> the needed field in the balancer manager of course to switch between  
> enabled,
> disabled and stopped.
>

Yeah, but we *should* differentiate between the 2. There are (well,
should be) administrative status and "runtime" status.


Mime
View raw message