Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 426 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2008 08:07:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2008 08:07:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 54717 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2008 08:07:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54662 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2008 08:07:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54651 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2008 08:07:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:07:25 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jfclere@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.158] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:06:55 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2382645fgg.40 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:07:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KE+SlrWmd+C/fQr3wSEe6uN5u8aiQ8khogAhx0p1yTQ=; b=qcRlc2MXoRPqMwOdAwSE7ZIYNvlF1cxXZ9FKNpTSWOs973VTosuncUDa/j2evuhoPAH4g2uSz8uGWzJ7xva8IRs86voDfxLaqG4jQTSbwlm1F8fyaPy0wC6xZ1GsozuO98MnVfMlNe9zkB7VlvQx+B9N09yx9t8RrSTvl+CY0ms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=u9zjuGSngvZBy8tgtF69Bd7U9Fzsi8yht7nOz1eX78fJZk1XDwJz44m+ye4QFoBoFfrMVjvbdPZkAKSiwlycuNBrKiMyvK6VrKsiFeR3OeX1yWePkMYwkyDWntOBWZSvHYBSYjRhc5HNIc0XpaHB3pwZk5efbLVFW4mJnNOB3Po= Received: by 10.82.134.12 with SMTP id h12mr19938910bud.29.1202371621110; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.143? ( [212.249.12.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10sm11179662muh.13.2008.02.07.00.06.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:06:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47AABC1B.5070406@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:06:51 +0100 From: jean-frederic clere User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_proxy timeouts in the 2.0 References: <1202241129.2426.199.camel@lost.cnet.cnwk> <20080206140459.r9epnditwss8k8k8@webmail.1command.com> In-Reply-To: <20080206140459.r9epnditwss8k8k8@webmail.1command.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Chris H. wrote: > Quoting Jim Jagielski : > >> >> On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Ronald Park wrote: >>> >>> Attached is my patch to 2.0.63 to the proxy_http.c file in >>> modules/proxy. >>> >> >> I didn't see any attached patch... :/ Without the patch the whole discussion is useless ;-( >> >> In any case, the normal process is patch applied to >> trunk with then backport proposals to 2.2 and 2.0. A feature >> added to 2.0.x, without it being in 2.2 and trunk is likely >> not gonna happen. > > If I understood the original posting correctly. This is a /fix/ > not a /feature/. Isn't there any interest in correcting issues > in the 2.0.x branch? Or am I to understand that the term "feature" > also means "fix(es)". :) What we normally do is to fix trunk and port back to 2.2.x and/or 2.0.x. Cheers Jean-Frederic > >> >> > > >