httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niklas Edmundsson <ni...@acc.umu.se>
Subject Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:01:34 GMT
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Ruediger Pluem wrote:

> Quick, maybe completely stupid question as I suspect the problem in 
> apr_brigade_partition:

Quick answer before I go to bed :)

> I always thought that apr_off_t and apr_size_t are *always* of the 
> same size and that the only difference between them is that 
> apr_size_t is unsigned whereas apr_off_t is signed.

> Is this thought correct?

No.

>From my understanding, apr_size_t is what can be addressed by the 
architecture, ie. on a 32bit machine it would be 32bit unsigned.

apr_off_t is the file offset, and thus not coupled to the 
architecture but rather if we're LFS capable or not.

/Nikke
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se      |     nikke@acc.umu.se
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  In case of fire, yell, "FIRE" You know it makes sense
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Mime
View raw message