httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: mod_substitute docs
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:05:52 GMT

On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Vincent Bray wrote:

> On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> So if you have substituted content that you think will be re- 
>> substituted
>> by another rule, then you should flatten. If they are one-shots, or
>> self contained, or in "no way" could result in overlaps, then  
>> flattening
>> isn't required. :)
>
> In your example, which of the two Substitute directives needs to have
> the 'f', or is it both?
>

The first, since it needs to ensure that the just-replaced content
(and all before/after it) finds themselves back into a single bucket.


Mime
View raw message