On Feb 13, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Erik Abele wrote:
> On 13.02.2008, at 16:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I added something similar to mod_jk quite awhile ago, and
>> I'm trying to get mod_jk and mod_proxy closer to parity,
>> esp for those using AJP. So with that in mind, comments
>> on the below??
>>
>> Index: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml (revision 627440)
>> +++ docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml (working copy)
>> @@ -693,6 +693,16 @@
>> in the pool the Apache will return <code>SERVER_BUSY</code>
>> status to
>> the client.
>> </td></tr>
>> + <tr><td>disablereuse</td>
>> + <td>Off</td>
>> + <td>This parameter should be used when you want to force
>> mod_proxy
>> + to immediately close a connection to the backend after being
>> used, and
>> + thus, disable its persistant connection and pool for that
>> backend.
>
> "persistent" instead of "persistant"?
>
> +1 to the rest.
>
me no spelll too guud :)
|