httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "josh rotenberg" <joshrotenb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: store_headers in memcache and diskcache
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:26:24 GMT
grr, this cold is making me dumber than usual. the link:

http://code.google.com/p/modmemcachecache/

On Feb 6, 2008 1:25 PM, josh rotenberg <joshrotenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> if it helps at all, here was my attempt at a working
> mod_memcached_cache. i've been meaning to look at it again and do some
> cleanup/testing/benchmarking/etc, haven't had the chance though.
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 11:17 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2008, at 7:58 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:49:43PM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > >> On Feb 5, 2008 1:45 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> > >> <dirkx@webweaving.org> wrote:
> > >>> Caching experts --  why do memcache and diskcache have seemingly
> > >>> quite
> > >>> different caching strategies when it comes to storing the headers ?
> > >>> E.g. the cache_object_t * is populated with the status/date/etc data
> > >>> in memcache - but not in disk-cache. Is this work in progress or
> > >>> subtle design ?
> > >>>
> > >>> I am trying to understand (got  a working mod_memcached_cache.c* --
> > >>> and cannot quite get the right VARY behaviour).
> > >>
> > >> If I had to guess I'd say it's because people have actually been
> > >> working on disk cache, while mem cache has been largely ignored for a
> > >> while.
> > >
> > > Definitely! I remember the original patches tried to create some nice
> > > abstractions so that more logic would move into mod_cache propery than
> > > in mod_*_cache, but there turned out to be so many corner cases within
> > > mod_disk_cache itself - and noone seems to /use/ mod_mem_cache - that
> > > that fell by the wayside :/
> >
> > Thanks ! That is useful info -- so for now I'll focus on
> > mod_disk_cache -- and once I got that mapped to mod_memcached -- will
> > then see if we can abstract that into a cleaner mod_memcache. But
> > first priority is getting it clean-ish/same-ish relative to the ssl
> > use of memcached (my usecase is OpenID -- which is 'heavy' on both).
> >
> > Dw
> >
>

Mime
View raw message