httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Covener" <cove...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: mod_substitute docs
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:50:07 GMT
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
>
>  On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Vincent Bray wrote:
>
>  > On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>  >> So if you have substituted content that you think will be re-
>  >> substituted
>  >> by another rule, then you should flatten. If they are one-shots, or
>  >> self contained, or in "no way" could result in overlaps, then
>  >> flattening
>  >> isn't required. :)
>  >
>  > In your example, which of the two Substitute directives needs to have
>  > the 'f', or is it both?
>  >
>
>  The first, since it needs to ensure that the just-replaced content
>  (and all before/after it) finds themselves back into a single bucket.
>
>

Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such as:

'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this substitutions
replacement string.

-- 
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message