Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jorge.schrauwen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.128.186 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=PUK8Ltp9QEQeSBaoys7TWk7UJ5sagGkVzbx/LEgB0UXwQ6rvU3gIZ1Ff8YZIKcYPYdGSn2uO6JOEjivAYut/66pcwobhSekPFAOjtMDDQ9kFxUL//FrwHKzmxEbggWfTj1ddsK8QrsXuFiueD2UADZHEF3FDEMYzWp66pFquRbY=
Message-ID: <43e40e000801051121r2ffd3432nbe4b08c2b89772c1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:21:57 +0100
From: "Jorge Schrauwen" <jorge.schrauwen@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] initial release of httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.1
In-Reply-To: <477FD718.3060405@rowe-clan.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <477C5681.6000403@rowe-clan.net>
	 <T3D98nOcwOLtIwleoTosAsNJcOxBZqHbZ05t0r4UvWv@akmail>
	 <477FD718.3060405@rowe-clan.net>

I actualy like that the status files are packed, why aren't they
packed for the other packages?

But I'd say do what the others do.

On Jan 5, 2008 8:14 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Guenter Knauf wrote:
> >
> >> See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_ftp/tags/0.9.1/STATUS-FTP
> >
> > first line of STATUS reads:
> > MOD_FTP 3.0 STATUS:
> >
> > a little bit strange the 3.0 while the module has now 0.9.1 version....
>
> Fixed.  I would be happy to reroll without STATUS if people agree that
> it should be omitted; we don't actually package STATUS in other httpd
> related packages.  WDYT?
>


-- 
~Jorge