httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Olaf van der Spek" <olafvds...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is async the answer?
Date Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:29:24 GMT
On Jan 28, 2008 9:22 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >> http://www.php.net/manual/en/
> >> faq.installation.php#faq.installation.apache2
> >
> > "If you feel you have to use a threaded MPM, look at a FastCGI
> > configuration where PHP is running in its own memory space."
> >
> > Is that what is meant by "Fastcgi is the "recommended way of using php
> > and httpd 2, AFAIK. Isn't it???"?
> > A single line seems a bit odd for the recommended approach.
> >
>
> Consider that, for many people, the main advantage of Apache2 over
> Apache1 is the worker MPM. Also consider that a threaded MPM and
> mod_php aren't a happy couple. If using prefork, mod_php works
> just dandy... but for other reasons you'd likely want to
> consider FastCGI anyway...

I agree that FastCGI is the better technical solution, I'm just
stating that neither the Apache documentation nor the PHP
documentation seems to state that. Even worse, they hardly document
the FastCGI way at all.

Mime
View raw message