httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Olaf van der Spek" <olafvds...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is async the answer?
Date Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:35:10 GMT
On Jan 28, 2008 8:04 PM, Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 12:36 PM, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 2008 6:18 PM, Akins, Brian <Brian.Akins@turner.com> wrote:
> > > On 1/24/08 3:14 PM, "Olaf van der Spek" <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Working on making a FastCGI based setup the recommended approach
> > > > instead of mod_php is probably more important then async. Actually,
> > > > it's a prerequisite.
> > >
> > > Fastcgi is the "recommended way of using php and httpd 2, AFAIK. Isn't it???
> >
> > Where can I read about that recommendation?
> > I can't find it in the Apache or PHP manuals.
> > mod_php appears to be *the* solution.
>
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/faq.installation.php#faq.installation.apache2

"If you feel you have to use a threaded MPM, look at a FastCGI
configuration where PHP is running in its own memory space."

Is that what is meant by "Fastcgi is the "recommended way of using php
and httpd 2, AFAIK. Isn't it???"?
A single line seems a bit odd for the recommended approach.

Mime
View raw message