httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <n...@webthing.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r609953 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/CHANGES
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:28:28 GMT
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:25:54 -0500
Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> In any case, one sees that we've done it both ways.
> Consider 2.2.5 and 2.2.1. Same with the 2.0.x
> ones as well...
> 
> Looking back, I prefer keeping the "old" way, where
> once we've tagged, we have a corresponding entry
> in CHANGES... My intent is to keep the 2.2.7,
> 2.0.62 and 1.3.40 lines in CHANGES.

Agreed.  I'd have preferred not wiping 2.2.5 from the record,
but not strongly enough to make a fuss.

-- 
Nick Kew

Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/

Mime
View raw message