Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96166 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2007 19:59:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2007 19:59:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 51152 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2007 19:58:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 51074 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2007 19:58:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 51063 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2007 19:58:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:58:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:58:54 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D18D29A96 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:58:33 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <475AF4E1.1080405@apache.org> References: <475AAC83.3020802@apache.org> <19071E4D-02D2-470F-B2EC-174FFBBA9CE2@jaguNET.com> <475AF4E1.1080405@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <45E3E88D-E05A-4FB2-8CC3-6161830A0429@jaguNET.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Enable persistence for SSL connections to the backend for reverse proxy Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:58:32 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 8, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > BTW: I have not tested with FTP proxing so far. > By the by, found a few cycles to test the patch as is... so far, I see no issues... So +1 for folding it into -trunk and we'll address anything that may pop up in there :)