httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guenter Knauf <fua...@apache.org>
Subject Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ?
Date Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:21:06 GMT
Hi,
> On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Anyone opposed to us shooting for a T&R early next week?
>>
>> If we can get a couple of security-related-but-not-really patches
>> committed to 2.0 I'd like to see that as well.  I'm offering,

> Sure... that would be great. Another three-for-all :)

>  From what I can see, both 1.3 and 2.2 are backport
> free, so it's just 2.0 right now.
any chance we can get this simple patch in to correct a type mismatch
which bothers me all the time when compiling with OpenSSL 0.9.8 on NetWare?
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/ssl_scache_shmht.c.diff

--- ssl_scache_shmht.c.orig	Wed Jul 12 09:40:56 2006
+++ ssl_scache_shmht.c	Sun Nov 25 17:32:58 2007
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
     SSLModConfigRec *mc = myModConfig(s);
     void *vp;
     SSL_SESSION *sess = NULL;
-    UCHAR *ucpData;
+    MODSSL_D2I_SSL_SESSION_CONST UCHAR *ucpData;
     int nData;
     time_t expiry;
     time_t now;
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
         return NULL;
     }
     memcpy(&expiry, vp, sizeof(time_t));
-    memcpy(ucpData, (char *)vp+sizeof(time_t), nData);
+    memcpy((void *)ucpData, (char *)vp+sizeof(time_t), nData);
     ssl_mutex_off(s);
 
     /* make sure the stuff is still not expired */

Guenter.






Mime
View raw message