Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42615 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2007 13:54:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2007 13:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 8209 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2007 13:54:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 7898 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2007 13:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 7887 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2007 13:54:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:54:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO grimnir.webthing.com) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:54:42 +0000 Received: from grimnir.webthing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimnir.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8A82146 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:53:49 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:53:49 +0100 From: Nick Kew To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r582251 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Message-ID: <20071005145349.603adf89@grimnir> In-Reply-To: <20071005132223.602141A9832@eris.apache.org> References: <20071005132223.602141A9832@eris.apache.org> Organization: WebThing X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.0-rc3 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:22:22 -0000 rpluem@apache.org wrote: > * mod_proxy_http: Remove Warning headers with wrong date > PR 16138 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=580782 > +1: niq > - +0: rpluem says: Please give struct foo a meaningful name first. > - -0: jim says: Agree with rpluem. Actually, I'd veto this patch > - based simply on that naming if I could. > + -1: rpluem says: Patch does not apply cleanly even if r580457 is > + ported back first. > niq: changed the name. Resisted temptation to use > "pooltabletime". > + rpluem says: Revision of name change is r581030. I'm confused. What failed to apply there? Are we missing some other patch required for this one? -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/