Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16071 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2007 18:35:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2007 18:35:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 996 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2007 18:35:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 937 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2007 18:35:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 922 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2007 18:35:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:35:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:35:04 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4052B9A39B for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:34:14 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20071001191848.2a654c4c@grimnir> References: <20071001180814.67E281A9838@eris.apache.org> <20071001181244.GB15995@devsys.jaguNET.com> <20071001191848.2a654c4c@grimnir> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <14E1BBBC-AB73-4C73-B969-87F13C2AF3A1@jaguNET.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: svn commit: r581030 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:34:14 -0400 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:12:44 -0400 > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Well, at least addit_dammit is descriptive :) > > Aha, so the struct should've been called holdit_dammit! :)