Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73801 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2007 00:15:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2007 00:15:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 22489 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2007 00:15:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 21599 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2007 00:15:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 21587 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2007 00:15:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:15:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.39] (HELO smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:15:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 11757 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2007 00:15:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.39) with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2007 00:15:15 -0000 Message-ID: <46DDF513.8040405@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:15:15 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review References: <200709050009.l8509TaS056691@devsys.jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <200709050009.l8509TaS056691@devsys.jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Hmmm... yeah, bummer. If that's it though, I'm +1 on keeping > as is... we can document this. Or, we could *gasp* just reroll :/ Or we can repack the same files. This is a packaging artifact, not an artifact of source control. Bill