Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75727 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2007 21:35:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2007 21:35:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 12762 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2007 21:34:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12555 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2007 21:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12544 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2007 21:34:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:34:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of info@apachelounge.com designates 213.46.255.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.46.255.22] (HELO viefep15-int.chello.at) (213.46.255.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:36:15 +0000 Received: from land10web.com ([62.194.40.33]) by viefep15-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070906213432.YUSX7965.viefep15-int.chello.at@land10web.com> for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 23:34:32 +0200 Received: from mother (unverified [62.194.40.33]) by land10web.com (Land10 mail) with ESMTP id 1417-1959671 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:34:31 +0200 Message-ID: <001601c7f0cd$b5b3cd50$0100a8c0@mother> From: "Steffen" To: References: <68CC494D-8EDD-4017-84B0-4C9ECA9357B9@jaguNET.com> <001601c7f097$6ee667b0$0100a8c0@mother> <46E06F96.90201@rowe-clan.net> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 23:34:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The later post was a report of an other tester, sorry no answer I have. Yes, I dicusssed it with the maintainer of mod_fcgid today. He is puzzling now an as I told before, we have to wait. Oh, btw: mod_perl (also build with VC8) is not working with 2.2.6, with 2.2.5 RC no single issue. Steffen ----- Original Message ----- From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 23:22 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review > Steffen wrote: >> >> I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6 because is >> not compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We shall advise to >> stay on 2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC. > > If you would like to clear up FUD ("some mods") with "explicit mods" that > would be productive. It would also be productive to discuss your concern > with the mod_fcgid maintainers, as the apr behavior is not likely to be > regressed to the previous behavior of leaking file handles (which I > suspect > mod_fcgid had leveraged). > > If I understand your later post; > >> mod_fcgid is not working for me, either with Perl or with my own FCGI >> test program. > > your issues with mod_perl were in conjunction -with- mod_fcgid? Just > trying > to narrow down the focus. > > Bill >