httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:57:22 GMT

On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:

>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Jim Jagielski
>> Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:06
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer
>>
>
>>
>> Regarding the 2nd one... the:
>>
>> +            else {
>> +                worker_is_initialized = 0;
>> +            }
>>
>> seems redundant... But other than that nit, looks good!
>
> Point taken. Thanks for catching it.
> My approach would be to commit the 2nd patch first, get it backported
> and improve things on trunk with the first patch afterwards.
> Another approach would be to commit the first patch to trunk and  
> propose
> the second for backport. I am not sure about the best approach here.
>

The 1st sounds better to me... And it's not *that* ugly :) :)


Mime
View raw message