httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:23:54 GMT


On 09/05/2007 04:29 PM, Plüm wrote:
> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Jim Jagielski  
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. September 2007 23:29
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org; testers@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release 
>> candidate tarballs for review
>>
>>
>> Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
>> Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
>> as expected at:
>>
>>      http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
>> Sept 7, unless otherwise noted...
>>
>>    +/-1   (x == +1)
>>
>>    [  ]    apache_1.3.39
>>    [  ]    httpd-2.0.61
>>    [  ]    httpd-2.2.6
> 
> Results for 2.0.61 / 2.2.6:
> 
> md5 / signature ok for .tar.gz / .tar.bz2.
> 
> Solaris 9:
> 
> 5.9 Generic_122300-05 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine Solaris
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.2
> 
> No regressions in the perl framework tests that can run on my box compared to 2.2.4 /
2.0.59.
> 
> 2.0.61: Failed 6/63 test scripts, 90.48% okay. 21/1569 subtests failed, 98.66% okay.
> 2.2.6 : Failed 6/63 test scripts, 90.48% okay. 2/1579 subtests failed, 99.87% okay.
> 
> Solaris 8:
> 
> 5.8 Generic_117350-46 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine Solaris
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.2
> 
> Compiles and starts up fine (did not run the perl framework).
> 
> Linux tests will follow with my votes.

No regression on SuSE Linux 10.2 (32 bit). So

+1 from me on 2.2.6 and 2.0.61

Regards

Rüdiger


Mime
View raw message