+1:1.3.39
Builds with nothing except for signedness warnings on Win32 (mostly
related to goofy FD_SET declarations by MS). So no adverse symptoms.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2007, at 8:15 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmmm... yeah, bummer. If that's it though, I'm +1 on keeping
>>> as is... we can document this. Or, we could *gasp* just reroll :/
>>
>> Or we can repack the same files. This is a packaging artifact, not
>> an artifact of source control.
>
> repackaged and uploaded. Should sync in a coupla hours.
Sigs look great, package contents (adjusted to new path) check out.
> I should really spend some cycles and update release.sh for 1.3 :)
Considering how often that might be used again (perhaps never?) - knock
yourself out. That's the real spirit of scratching our own itches :)
Bill
|