httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jorge Schrauwen" <jorge.schrau...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:37:47 GMT
On 9/6/07, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>
> The later post was a report of an other tester, sorry no answer I have.
>
> Yes, I dicusssed it with the maintainer of mod_fcgid today. He is puzzling
> now an as I told before, we have to wait.
>
> Oh, btw:  mod_perl (also build with VC8) is not working with 2.2.6, with
> 2.2.5 RC no single issue.


Odd works fine with my limited setup over here.
I you want to try my binary?


Steffen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
> To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 23:22
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate
> tarballs for review
>
>
> > Steffen wrote:
> >>
> >> I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6 because  is
> >> not compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We shall advise to
> >> stay on 2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC.
> >
> > If you would like to clear up FUD ("some mods") with "explicit mods"
> that
> > would be productive.  It would also be productive to discuss your
> concern
> > with the mod_fcgid maintainers, as the apr behavior is not likely to be
> > regressed to the previous behavior of leaking file handles (which I
> > suspect
> > mod_fcgid had leveraged).
> >
> > If I understand your later post;
> >
> >> mod_fcgid is not working for me, either with Perl or with my own FCGI
> >> test program.
> >
> > your issues with mod_perl were in conjunction -with- mod_fcgid?  Just
> > trying
> > to narrow down the focus.
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
>


-- 
~Jorge

Mime
View raw message